3RD ANNUAL LEGAL QUIZ & DEBATE COMPETITION








SOLACE CHAMBERS, FACULTY OF LAW, BAYERO UNIVERSITY KANO


Presents


3RD ANNUAL LEGAL QUIZ & DEBATE COMPETITION


It’s another year of sharp arguments, fast thinking, and unmatched legal brilliance!

Solace Chambers proudly presents the 2024/2025 Legal Quiz & Debate Competition — an annual intellectual event designed to sharpen legal reasoning and deepen substantive and procedural knowledge of law.


EVENT DETAILS

Date: Wednesday, 10th December 2025

Time: 2:00 PM

Venue: Theatre II


Debate Topic:

“Right of Appeal Under Section 241(2) of the 1999 Constitution: Which Interpretation Reflects the Drafters' Intent?”


Quiz Segment:

A rigorous test covering key areas of Nigerian law:

Commercial law, Equity & Trust, Mu'amalat and Islamic law of tort, Constitutional law, Nigerian legal system, Law of contract, Introduction to Shariah, Legal Method, LegaI Ethics and Civil & Criminal Procedure



Join us for a thrilling session of constitutional debate, analysis, and academic excellence.


Wants to know more about us?

Visit our Website:

Website: https://www.solacechambersbuk.com.ng



Be there to witness brilliance. Be part of the experience.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Monthly Opportunities Highlight: The Month of 'MAY'

Dear Partners! Catch up with our May opportunities highlight! Featured Opportunities: A) OAL SET Mentorship Programme, 2025 : A virtual internship for enthusiasts in Entertainment Law, Intellectual Property Law, Sports Law, Technology Law and Media Law   Application Deadline : 23rd May, 2025   Learn More :  https://bit.ly/OALSETMP B) Harlem Solicitors Virtual Internship, 2025 : A virtual internship that focuses on Telecommunications Law   Application Deadline : 23rd May, 2025.   Learn More : https://www.linkedin.com/posts/harlemsolicitors_interns-internship-activity-7325851343456256001-nfpi?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android&rcm=ACoAADowf8EBk8_VUBhZJbQt2m2BkWcITzAw-v8 C) VAZI Internship, 2025:   A summer internship, equipping final-year students & recent graduates with the essential skills needed to thrive and excel in the fast-evolving tech law landscape.   Application Deadline:  31st of May, 2025.   Learn Mor...
Read more

THE REQUIREMENTS OF APPEALING AS A PARTY INTERESTED

Image
The position of the law is that a person who was not a party to a suit at the trial court can appeal to the court of appeal as an interested party but to do that he must seek the leave of the court and such leave cannot be subsumed into a trinity prayer because the leave is a condition precedent and failure to obtain it renders the court incompetent to assume jurisdiction and the trial court is the most appropriate court from where the leave should be seek first. This position of law was reiterated by the Supreme Court in the case of F.A.A.N V. Bi Courtney Ltd. (2025) 7 NWLR (pt. 1989) 365.  The brief narration of the fact of the case and what led to the above pronouncements by the Apex Court is that The Federal Government of Nigeria granted a concession to Bi Courtney Limited(1st respondent) for the redevelopment of the fire-razed Murtala Mohammed Airport Domestic Terminal 2 (MMA2) in Ikeja, Lagos, under a Build, Operate, and Transfer (BOT) arrangement. The concession ...
Read more

An Explanation of the Maxim: Leges Posteriores Priores Contrarias Abrogant

Image
If there are two conflicting laws applicable to a circumstance, situation or fact, it bears the question of which of these two conflicting laws shall be considered and applied. One cannot just take any one based on speculative mind since the law has to be certain. In this vain, this piece brings to you a thorough research of the subject matter with adequate authorities. The maxim “ Leges posteriores priores contrarias abrogant ” is translated as “ [s]ubsequent laws repeal prior conflicting ones” — See Black's Law Dictionary (8th ed. 2004), Page 5327. To put differently, later laws abrogate earlier contrary ones. It is a principle which states that, where two laws or legal instruments conflict, the one adopted later in time, rather than the one adopted earlier, is considered binding on the relevant parties. That is, when two statutes conflict, the one enacted last prevails. The provisions of a later document are contrary to those of an earlier, the earliest must ...
Read more